Jul 14, 2020 · Ipfire appears to be basic compared to pfsense. This is because pfsense has a lot of features that are difficult to find in professional firewalls, put together and packaged in a rather modern web interface. However, the features in ipfire though fewer, are the most vital for web security and are extremely well tested and very stable.
Aug 27, 2017 · BSD-based operating systems such as pfSense use single CPU core for routing. Linux based systems are spreading the routing load between CPU cores. APU routers have 4 CPU cores. IPFire is able to use all of them for routing, while pfSense is using just one. Apr 14, 2020 · Unlike IPFire, pfSense already has a feature for a captive portal, whereby all DNS queries can be resolved to a single IP address such as a landing page for a public Wi-Fi hotspot. Apr 04, 2019 · * A few free & open source distros like IPFire and PFSense had ISOs specifically for headless embedded systems, like Alix boards. If I had an Alix-based system (I used to), I'd probably build it on PFSense or IPFire. So long story shortmad props to PFSense and Untangle, and a well-deserved honorable mention to IPFire. UPDATE - 2013/7/18 OPNsense has nicer user interface, and seems to be implementing new features faster than pfSense. pfSense has been around for longer, so the community is bigger and there's more documentation online. IPFire has less mature user interface, so we don't recommend it, unless you already know it. 4) I currently have an issue in pfSense where cache deliveries are traffic shaped. Does IPFire traffic shape the the cache deliveries, or is squid/Update Accelerator after the shaper? 5) Does IPfire have the concept of Domain overrides? the ability to use a different DNS server depending on the URL?
PFSense: Wow, im impressed. A bit more technical install then the others, but worth it. Nice web interface, nice terminal menu. Pros: The terminal menu (at first I saw this as a minus until I
pfSense® CE VS OPNsense: comparing performances To have another point of comparison we decided to test on site some of the systems performance. We chosen to do the files transfer tests between two hosts connected behind two Firewall Entry level . Test OpenVAS on pfSense to measure vulnerabilities. Obviously with the same parameters you could do the same thing with OPNsense Zeroshell and IPfire. For those wishing to investigate other aspects related to the optimization of firewalls linked to the GDPR legislation, you can read this article.
pfSense is an open source firewall/router computer software distribution based on FreeBSD. It is installed on a physical computer or a virtual machine to make a dedicated firewall/router for a network. It can be configured and upgraded through a web-based interface, and requires no knowledge of the underlying FreeBSD system to manage.
4) I currently have an issue in pfSense where cache deliveries are traffic shaped. Does IPFire traffic shape the the cache deliveries, or is squid/Update Accelerator after the shaper? 5) Does IPfire have the concept of Domain overrides? the ability to use a different DNS server depending on the URL? Mar 04, 2020 · A tale as old as time pfsense vs OPNsense. Which do you prefer? Both do a fantastic job. Seeed Studio Odyssey x86 as Router review! pfsense, opnsense, ipfire, clearos, endian - Duration: 10:35. pfSense® CE VS OPNsense: comparing performances To have another point of comparison we decided to test on site some of the systems performance. We chosen to do the files transfer tests between two hosts connected behind two Firewall Entry level . Test OpenVAS on pfSense to measure vulnerabilities. Obviously with the same parameters you could do the same thing with OPNsense Zeroshell and IPfire. For those wishing to investigate other aspects related to the optimization of firewalls linked to the GDPR legislation, you can read this article. pfsense is a monster in performance vs an ASA that you have to shed tons of $$ to get equivalent performance. The Stateful inspection throughput on a custom pfsense box or embeded Netgate box is way faster than any Cisco ASA.